Login

Lost your password?
Don't have an account? Sign Up

How Construction Technology Could Solve The Climate Emergency

Contact us to Add Your Business

How construction, with the help of cutting-edge digital twin technology, could play a key role in solving the climate emergency. Learn more about digital twin technology –

Digital twin technology for buildings is available and in use on real projects right now. Find out more about how IES' digital twin technology is being used to achieve zero carbon targets and to help fight the climate emergency –

For more by The B1M subscribe now:   

Read the full story on this video, including images and useful links, here: 

Narrated by Fred Mills. Additional footage courtesy of IES.

View this video and more at –
Follow us on Twitter –
Like us on Facebook –
Follow us on LinkedIn –
Follow us on Instagram –

#construction #architecture #climate

We welcome you sharing our content to inspire others, but please be nice and play by our rules:

Our content may only be embedded onto third party websites by arrangement. We have established partnerships with domains to share our content and help it reach a wider audience. If you are interested in partnering with us please contact Enquiries@TheB1M.com.

Ripping and/or editing this video is illegal and will result in legal action.

© 2019 The B1M Limited

Click Here to Add Your Business

https://www.constructions.club

53 comments

    1. Thomas Anderson

      @alex3261 what is really sad is that I could not see any real solutions between all the “THE CLIMATE” fluff, if they had just pointed out their improvement techniques it would have given far more access to this info, but I suspect they don’t really have any, since all I could see is “we can use AI to tell us how to do our job better” which we see how AI algorithms telling people what to do worked out on youtube with elsagate LOL

    2. Owen Ryan

      Misa M if you dispute facts proven by decades of research and evidence your not just having a different opinion, that would be saying “yes I see that this is a problem but I don’t think we should solve it like this”. Refusing to believe hard scientific evidence is not an opinion.

    1. TheFerruccio

      @The B1M I’ll go as far as back up Danny Le on doing an April Fools video, but I’d want it to be a total mystery and would rather you do your own thing for it, whatever it may be.

  1. Treefarm

    Recycled materials are important, too, to save energy in manufacturing. When your own house needs renovation recycling materials uses less resources and extends the building’s life. You could also discuss the concrete alternative ingredients work going on now, like not using sand.

    1. Susan Lee

      It’s a lot more complex than that if you can use existing waste material that’s already on site you remove the need of transporting that material both to and from site. It also stops it from going to landfills. That’s just one of many ways to reduce a footprint but by looking at the wider process and finding ways to remove unnecessary and wasteful elements is key.

    2. Treefarm

      @Foginxtor Yes you’re right about that but I meant for example using timber from demolished buildings (I built my house that way) and reusing materials still ok to build secondary buildings like sheds, for example metal roofing, timber. Concrete is harder to recycle but can be used in foundations and for private roadways or walls. Done on a larger scale it is more versatile but yes could require energy to break up, whereas the materials mentioned above only need some muscle power and small hand or power tools.

    1. Roy Costa

      @The B1M It’s cool! The Hive was designed to maximize passive cooling so even in tropical Singapore, even the un-airconditioned places are significantly cooler than the surroundings. Lots of buildings also have solar panels at the top!

  2. RoboJules

    What if we tapped the excess steam of central heating systems, built turbines at water substations, and used small modular nuclear reactors instead of fossil fuel generators to deal with spikes in demand for electricity.

    1. Thomas Anderson

      @AKUJIRULE actually even more possibly concerning for those worried here, we will probably not only survive but spread by launching off world and de-evolving from what ever elitist thinking we might have achieved by learning so much about tech, as the Egyptians apparently did, by building pyramids for various reasons, using geopolymers and then de-evolving tech wise to the point they had to resort to stealing stones they made to build things and the re-purposing the pyramids for less tech related purposes each few generations as they forget what itt was even for most likely LOL.

  3. Selby

    Although the production of the video is good, the content of the video just makes it feel like one big paid advert for a company. Especially when they use specific terms which may or may not be marketing terms. It would be a lot better to present the ideas without the brand recognition or a multitude of different solutions as to not favour one. It seems like a couple of videos have been like this. Other than that, it was a great video 🙂

  4. Osamah Aldoaiss

    Fixing Climate Change involves changing a lot of the things us humans do. Every part of society has to research what they can do, to fix the issues, they are causing.

    I love the things mentioned here, that Construction can fix. If we do not work on that, things will get worse real fast.

    1. Glorious Bastard

      @K MA they don’t. These idiots believe that if Westerners all used paper straws and had solar panels then problem solved. They are blind to unsustainable population growth (mainly non-white), deforestation, third world industrial development using fossil fuels and ocean acidification thanks to globalism.

    2. K MA

      Does anyone pushing this stuff ever do math? Does anyone who makes this argument ever actually sit down and try and figure out exactly what the impact of their intervention is going to be and compare that to the cost of their intervention? Or is it always “we have to do _something_ or we’re all going to _die_ !”? If you do this, how much are you going to lower the global average surface temperature and over what timescale?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*